So now you’ve watched my video …
And now see how a few simple measurements and a little common sense (PDNA) have proved that the “Umatilla Bigfoot” couldn’t possibly be a human. And does in fact have the exact same body proportions as the Patterson Bigfoot (and others I’ve measured.)
So what do we make of the video now, what can be learned from what we’ve witnessed …?
For one … we see a lone Forest Giant, crossing over a steep peak, headed for an unknown destination. Which tells us FGs don’t always travel in packs, pods, clans, tribes or whatever you prefer.
Could this loner be an adult male, who prefers a more solitary existence?
Could it be that Forest Giant mothers band together to care for their children as “a community?” And don’t allow the big, breeding males to be part of their daily worlds, because their presence causes too much strife and disharmony amongst the tribe …?
Or is it all of the above?
We don’t and can’t know. All we humans can do is guess at the inner-workings of the Forest Giant world and speculate. But the scenarios proposed above are at least logical and reasonable to assume.
Before wrapping this up ….
It’s never wise to walk up a steep slope, beyond the tree line, or walk along a ridge … because doing so means that you will then stick out like a cherry on a hot fudge sundae. Allowing anyone below, for miles around, to see you, and possibly track you.
And we’ve seen this behavior before in another video.
So why would a lone Forest Giant put themselves at such a disadvantage, and make themselves vulnerable to attack …?
Maybe the answer is … if you’re the biggest, baddest mutha in the valley (or on the mountain) you just don’t have to give a damn. Because there’s nothing no animal or human can do about it.
Thanks for reading. And please don’t forget to subscribe on Youtube. Once I hit a million subscribers, I can then afford to make all my videos free to everyone!